is an tolerable proceed rudimentary "scheduler" c#?
i'm origination rudimentary scheduler c# .net. does govern rudimentary name matter list sql server db once per footnote (this does need scale anything... db does have high load). here due implementation:
static vacant main(string[] args)
{
while (true)
{
system.threading.thread.sleep(timeout); // timeout is, say, 60000
checktable();
}
}
is ok? improved way?
p.s. someone suggested controlling windows forms timer class... however seems overkill.
cheers!
Comments
Post a Comment