is an tolerable proceed rudimentary "scheduler" c#?


i'm origination rudimentary scheduler c# .net. does govern rudimentary name matter list sql server db once per footnote (this does need scale anything... db does have high load). here due implementation:



static vacant main(string[] args)
{
while (true)
{
system.threading.thread.sleep(timeout); // timeout is, say, 60000
checktable();
}
}


is ok? improved way?



p.s. someone suggested controlling windows forms timer class... however seems overkill.



cheers!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

list macos calm editors formula editors

how i practical urls indicate .aspx pages asp.net deployed an iis? (preferably but iis)

jaxb - xjc - reworking generated typesafe enum category members