should i use "mockist" "classical" tdd?
i've review (and re-read) martin fowler's . it, defines . attempts answer doubt "", nonetheless admits never attempted mockist tdd "anything some-more toys." i guess i'd ask doubt here. good answers competence repeat fowler's arguments (but hopefully some-more clearly) supplement arguments didn't cruise others have adult given fowler final updated minute behind january 2007.
Comments
Post a Comment