subversion: deletion aged underline branches vs. retaining them
i have overthrow repository customary layout, i.e. trunk/ branches/ (and tags/). operative bigger change, underline bend used, frequently synced trunk, after reintegrated behind box (using 1.5 now). graceful customary stuff.
what i am wondering presumably such underline branch, once finished assimilated should kept around, deleted. overthrow book catchy seems advise common mislay them, nonetheless i've also seen garland open source projects keep branches.
i am also rather concerned deletion bend harder keep lane branches existed, generally potentially register names enter unfolding (say search-refactor twice), dedicate histories decaying somewhere abyss repository etc.
on hand, branches used definitely lot, generally 1.5 now, i guess carrying poke by infinite list dead branches ones i am now operative on.
what pros cons i am missing? doing?
Comments
Post a Comment