would engineer control api next-gen mars corsair calm instead an rpc?


forgive me verges being "discussion" question, nonetheless i unequivocally
appreciate yes/no answer, an suitable explanation.



suppose have settlement exercise control api robot, contend unbroken
generation mars rover. engineer api according calm
principles, model rpc, such xmlrpc?



i ask since i have something similar, nonetheless "robot" collection practical machines. i'm being urged rather impressive engineer, good famous rest advocate, api restful. i've never used rest principles, i'm struggling fit conceptualizing low-level inter-process apis. rest seems infused thesis interacting modifiable information repository, wholly hops away. i'm perplexing feels some-more closely determining robot. i remonstrate tough is, abstract, only information repository -- "put left turn", "put transport 100 meters", "get outmost temperature". nonetheless seems rather constructed model. i definitely accept advantage caching surrogate ("hello, jpl? akamai co-lo canberra. we're holding over corsair now, ok?")



so, calm settlement useful here? still aloft rpc even
when communication narrowly focused?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

list macos calm editors formula editors

how i practical urls indicate .aspx pages asp.net deployed an iis? (preferably but iis)

jaxb - xjc - reworking generated typesafe enum category members