what's 'correct' proceed registering/installing an public gac?


there seems lots opposite ways register assemblies gac, in, 'work'. however, what's "proper" proceed doing it?



in response lou franco (and gacutil):



i'm controlling gacutil development, nonetheless seems me repremand proceed exercise it, given gacutil isn't enclosed simple .net utilities past .net 1.1 - it's wholly developer tool.



additional: gacutil (as seen responses below) redistributable, therefore should used any app intend give developers. aka, customers. .



in response controlling wix:



wix competence good all, nonetheless does work underneath hood? sum creates proceed wix installs public right proceed exercise it? does feeling up? system/.net call? there dll buried somewhere system32 needs made?



(edit: looks wix uses msi underneath hood. comments supposed answer.)



final edit: looks repremand proceed exercise an public gac controlling windows installer, zero else. i'm going give wix try. interjection all!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

why does floated <input> control floated component slip over too distant right ie7, nonetheless firefox?

grails record upload problems

unable interpret unicode character