what's 'correct' proceed registering/installing an public gac?


there seems lots opposite ways register assemblies gac, in, 'work'. however, what's "proper" proceed doing it?



in response lou franco (and gacutil):



i'm controlling gacutil development, nonetheless seems me repremand proceed exercise it, given gacutil isn't enclosed simple .net utilities past .net 1.1 - it's wholly developer tool.



additional: gacutil (as seen responses below) redistributable, therefore should used any app intend give developers. aka, customers. .



in response controlling wix:



wix competence good all, nonetheless does work underneath hood? sum creates proceed wix installs public right proceed exercise it? does feeling up? system/.net call? there dll buried somewhere system32 needs made?



(edit: looks wix uses msi underneath hood. comments supposed answer.)



final edit: looks repremand proceed exercise an public gac controlling windows installer, zero else. i'm going give wix try. interjection all!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

list macos calm editors formula editors

how hibernate @any-related annotations?

why does floated <input> control floated component slip over too distant right ie7, nonetheless firefox?