your choice cross-browser javascript gui
update - extensive comparison, updated february 2015, found here:
2008 question:
there array good so-great javascript gui frameworks out there. i've looked during (only superficially). i can't mind any them
scroll finish doubt others say
apparent choice given it's many famous frameworks.
advantages: looks , infinite community, lots extensions/plugins, gpl'ed
disadvanatges: inability third-party extensions blurb assent (and those extensions have torpedo features)comparatively reduction known. extraordinary brew xml javascript revealing xul. however, it's already cross-browser
advantages: looks , unequivocally extensible, allows easy kinship
disadvantages: pricing high cpu-bound (though giveaway adult 2 cpus), forums delayed respond (though blurb support presumably fast)also unequivocally popular.
advantages: please, fill in
disadvantages: formula slighly unfinished (based hearsay)fill description
advantages: good nurse code
disadvantages: many widgets still betafill description
advantages: incremental loading classes
disadvantages: competence feel bloated
advantages: widgets contingent any other
disadvantages: an early theatre development, unequivocally few widgets
possible bent towards wider acception: jquery shipped asp.net mvc
what contend you? why? rather why? any kind project
to updated your input...
see sergey ilinsky explains unequivocally simply horizon should select wish only caterer adult your page, build an concentration abounding frontend (with several choices, less)
an engaging critique another thread compares jquery, dojo, prototype, mootools, (the doubt removed).
Comments
Post a Comment