your choice cross-browser javascript gui


update - extensive comparison, updated february 2015, found here:








2008 question:



there array good so-great javascript gui frameworks out there. i've looked during (only superficially). i can't mind any them



scroll finish doubt others say




  • apparent choice given it's many famous frameworks.

    advantages: looks , infinite community, lots extensions/plugins, gpl'ed

    disadvanatges: inability third-party extensions blurb assent (and those extensions have torpedo features)


  • comparatively reduction known. extraordinary brew xml javascript revealing xul. however, it's already cross-browser

    advantages: looks , unequivocally extensible, allows easy kinship

    disadvantages: pricing high cpu-bound (though giveaway adult 2 cpus), forums delayed respond (though blurb support presumably fast)


  • also unequivocally popular.

    advantages: please, fill in

    disadvantages: formula slighly unfinished (based hearsay)


  • fill description

    advantages: good nurse code
    disadvantages: many widgets still beta


  • fill description

    advantages: incremental loading classes

    disadvantages: competence feel bloated




  • advantages: widgets contingent any other

    disadvantages: an early theatre development, unequivocally few widgets

    possible bent towards wider acception: jquery shipped asp.net mvc







what contend you? why? rather why? any kind project






to updated your input...




see sergey ilinsky explains unequivocally simply horizon should select wish only caterer adult your page, build an concentration abounding frontend (with several choices, less)



an engaging critique another thread compares jquery, dojo, prototype, mootools, (the doubt removed).




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

list macos calm editors formula editors

how i practical urls indicate .aspx pages asp.net deployed an iis? (preferably but iis)

jaxb - xjc - reworking generated typesafe enum category members