what's inadequacy between "&> foo" "> foo 2>&1"?
there seem twin whack idioms redirecting stdout stderr file:
fooscript &> foo
... ...
fooscript > foo 2>&1
what's difference? seems me initial only by-pass second one, nonetheless colleague contends second furnish cost even there's an blunder initial redirect, since initial removed route errors stdout.
edit: okay... seems bargain i am asking, i try clarify:
can anyone give me an instance where twin specific lines lines combined above furnish opposite behavior?
Comments
Post a Comment