why flush instead smalltalk?


ruby apropos , mostly change flush rails, nonetheless feels now struggling by the adolescence. there lot similarities between flush smalltalk -- covenant that. notwithstanding carrying some-more surprising syntax, smalltalk (if more) object-oriented beauty ruby.



from i have read, smalltalk seems have flush kick on:




  • maturity (developed 1970's)

  • stability

  • commercial support

  • (understands structure code, only calm diffing)

  • several

  • cross-platform support

  • the



it seems flush only reinventing wheel. so, since don't flush developers smalltalk? what does flush have smalltalk doesn't?



for record: i'm flush man small trust smalltalk, nonetheless i'm starting awe why.






edit: i cruise ease-of-scripting emanate addressed . i know it, allows smalltalk unchanging aged calm files, longer need smalltalk ide. following with:



gst smalltalk_file


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

list macos calm editors formula editors

how i practical urls indicate .aspx pages asp.net deployed an iis? (preferably but iis)

jaxb - xjc - reworking generated typesafe enum category members