cng, cryptoserviceprovider managed implementations hashalgorithm


so i wondering there any vital differences between several implementations crush algorithms, take sha array algorithms example. have 3 implementations each, 1 managed formula 2 wrappers around opposite internal crypto apis, nonetheless there any vital differences between controlling any them? i suspect coupling versions have aloft opening given the being executed internal code, nonetheless surley hey need perform accurate same calculations so yield same cost ie hey interchangable. correct?



for instance sha512cng cant used xp sp2 (docs wrong) nonetheless sha512managed can.






@maxim - conclude you, nonetheless definitely i seeking for. i seeking there any difference, presumably performance, controlling managed/cryptoserviceprovider/cng implementations given crush algorithm. .net 3.5 crush algorithms 3 implementations, so



sha512managed
sha512cryptoserviceprovider
sha512cng



the latter twin being wrappers around internal apis. loyal shaxxx implementations example.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

list macos calm editors formula editors

how i practical urls indicate .aspx pages asp.net deployed an iis? (preferably but iis)

jaxb - xjc - reworking generated typesafe enum category members