why aged editors motion emacs arrangement inadequacy between record aegis interface?


does doubt sense? controlling presumably motion emacs, know interface exposes code's illustration state record modifying buffer, record on-disk storage fill aegis buffer to. things programmer know, nonetheless only modifying text, since exposed? any newer editor only tells "here file. correct it."



yes, i know technical meanings, nonetheless isn't question. doubt even good thought not. motion emacs the twin oldest editors common today, share behavior. i know new editor does same. editors stop doing why?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

list macos calm editors formula editors

how i practical urls indicate .aspx pages asp.net deployed an iis? (preferably but iis)

jaxb - xjc - reworking generated typesafe enum category members