is there benefit nested try/catch blocks?
one things always bugs me controlling readers streams java close() slight pitch an exception. given it's good thought put tie slight finally block, necessitates bit an stiff situation. i wholly construction:
filereader fr = new filereader("somefile.txt");
try {
try {
fr.read();
} finally {
fr.close();
}
} catch(exception e) {
// difference handling
}
but i've also seen construction:
filereader fr = new filereader("somefile.txt");
try {
fr.read()
} locate (exception e) {
// difference handling
} finally {
try {
fr.close();
} locate (exception e) {
// difference handling
}
}
i move initial construction since there's wholly locate retard only seems some-more elegant. there reason indeed move second an swap construction?
update: inadequacy i separate out both read close wholly pitch ioexceptions? seems approaching me that, review fails, tie destroy same reason.
Comments
Post a Comment