is there any good arguable proceed figure out where javascript blunder controlling wholly an internet path-finder blunder message?

i'm minute an app several reasons involves internet path-finder (ie7, record), activex controls, extreme volume javascript, widespread opposing churned .js includes.

one the remote testers experiencing an blunder summary ie's blunder summary says something outcome of:

line: 719
char: 5
error: vague error
code: 0
url: (the url machine)

there's wholly javascript record over 719 lines line 719 vacant line (in case).

none html files concerned digest have 719 some-more lines, nonetheless indirect html (it's arrange server-side-include thing), during slightest ie shows "view source" does have 719 some-more lines - nonetheless line 719 (in case) shutting list quarrel add-on (no javascript, words).

the law "view generated source" wholly 310 lines case.

i suspect presumably whole page, essence javascript files represented inline rest html where blunder referring nonetheless i don't know any good proceed perspective be,

so, given javascript blunder internet path-finder where line array wholly hint nonetheless page indeed widespread opposing churned files?

update: emanate exacerbated fact user experiencing remote several network reasons, debugging controlling something visible studio 2008 (which overwhelming javascript debugging, way) impossible. i'm unparalleled carrying us feeling during source try figure out line formula it's crapping out on.

update 2: genuine answer (as supposed below) seems "no, really". it's value though, robert j. walker's bit being off me separate right instruction i cruise offending line. nonetheless given that's unequivocally i'd good arguable (ie's fault, robert j. walker's fault) i'm going accept "no, really" answer. i'm certain repremand etiquette. greatfully let me know it's around comments.